Feature

RSS

A big part of successfully running a shopping center is ensuring the safety of tenants, their employees, your employees, and customers. With security cameras or a security guard and alarms, you might think that you have the safety aspect of your operations locked down. But here’s something that could be overlooked and that can come back to burn you, figuratively and literally: inadequate or no insurance for tenants whose businesses create waste that’s dangerous, either in the short or long term.

In recent years, filling space at shopping centers with smaller, non-traditional tenants rather than large national stores (many of which are suffering financially) has been a successful strategy for landlords. If you’re taking advantage of this rapidly growing trend, you should be aware that, while in the short term it can boost profits, it carries a substantial amount of risk in the long term. That’s because many smaller tenants often have a limited—or sometimes nonexistent—financial track record.

Rent abatement is frequently mentioned when discussing commercial leases. But it’s not as simple as including a clause that spells out the circumstances under which tenants are entitled to withhold rent. There are many variables and, if you don’t draft rent abatement provisions carefully, you could overlook specific items that can affect you later if the tenant exercises its right.

Tenants often seek financing to help them run their businesses, so you have probably gotten numerous requests from tenants for a “landlord’s lien waiver.” Without the lien waiver, a tenant’s lender may refuse to go through with the loan, or an equipment lessor may refuse to lease expensive equipment to the tenant. A lien waiver typically states that you agree to waive a valuable right—that is, the right to take possession of the tenant’s personal property if it doesn’t pay its rent.

No matter how successful you are at minimizing costs and maximizing profits from your leases with tenants at your shopping center or office building, there’s no reason to overlook new ways to generate more rent and income. After all, the real estate market is never 100 percent certain, and you never know when tenants could decide to leave your center or you could have other issues that cut into your profits, like lawsuits.

When a tenant violates a lease that subsequently ends in termination, shopping center and office building owners might be looking at hefty costs that at least initially will fall on them. Lost rent and the cost and effort of finding a replacement tenant can reach into the tens of thousands of dollars. So can damage left by the tenant, or the ramifications of a key tenant’s departure violating the requirements in other tenants’ leases that it stay open and operating.

Over a million restaurants in the United States generate billions in sales each year. Commercial property owners know that having a visible and successful restaurant is not only lucrative, but also can be an amenity that improves the image of the property and provides an essential service to residents and other tenants or occupants of an office building, shopping center, or mixed-use project, not to mention the local community. However, a large number of all new restaurants close after only one year of operation. And this rate greatly increases after three years.

Don’t be surprised if a prospective tenant asks you to give it early access to its space before all aspects of your deal are finalized. Some tenants are confident that their financing will go through and that other issues will be resolved without incident. A common reason in retail leasing for tenants to ask for the right to get into the space early is to avoid delays in opening. While it makes sense, and you might want to accommodate a tenant that brings something positive to your bottom line, the shopping center, or both, it’s also not harmless.

Violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) can be costly for commercial real estate owners. It’s a complicated law with nuances that create pitfalls for owners. While the ADA is detailed in terms of spelling out under what circumstances a building’s or a tenant’s space must be altered to make it accessible to people with disabilities, it doesn’t say who is responsible for making and paying for these alterations. That is, are owners or tenants on the hook for ensuring that accommodations are made and any violations that stem from them?

The design, practicality, and price of interior retail space are big ticket items when a tenant is deciding to lease space in a shopping center. But what a tenant can get and for what price doesn’t matter if other elements at the center don’t work for the tenant. Just as landlords like certainty on their side of the deal—and, accordingly, try to use lease forms that achieve that goal—tenants want to make sure that the crucial items they fought for in a deal today won’t go down the drain later.